To: emberheart75@yahoo.com, rfoust@dmv.com,PXSTEWART@salisbury.edu,
	Potterbarb@aol.com, lennart@lgedesigns.com,
	ajpica@salisbury.edu, bdpolkinghorn@salisbury.edu,
	conflictresolution@salisbury.edu, dwgelbman@hotmail.com,
	beebe@shore.intercom.net,
	DMWAGNER@salisbury.edu,sowpeace@juno.com
FCC: ~/rm.uu
Subject: Leaked Internal Document on Bush's Global Domination Plans
Reply-to: hb@harelbarzilai.org
--text follows this line--
Several *major* revelations from leaked internal Bush document,
reported  by UK's Sunday Herald. Frightening reading.

Although titled "Bush planned Iraq 'regime change' before becoming
President" and containing this major revelation -- there are many
more powerful revelations: this is nothing short of a blueprint for
Washington's military rule over the entire planet.

Also (finally) admitted: it's not about Saddam; Bush wants to control
Iraq and its oil if Saddam wasn't there. Wide dissemination encouraged.

= = = =


Bush planned Iraq 'regime change' before becoming President
 
By Neil Macka

A SECRET blueprint for US global domination reveals that President
Bush and his cabinet were planning a premeditated attack on Iraq to
secure 'regime change' even before he took power in January 2001.

The blueprint, uncovered by the Sunday Herald, for the creation of a
'global Pax Americana' was drawn up for Dick Cheney (now vice-
president), Donald Rumsfeld (defence secretary), Paul Wolfowitz
(Rumsfeld's deputy), George W Bush's younger brother Jeb and Lewis
Libby (Cheney's chief of staff). The document, entitled Rebuilding
America's Defences: Strategies, Forces And Resources For A New
Century, was written in September 2000 by the neo-conservative think-
tank Project for the New American Century (PNAC).

The plan shows Bush's cabinet intended to take military control of the
Gulf region whether or not Saddam Hussein was in power. It says: 'The
United States has for decades sought to play a more permanent role in
Gulf regional security. WHILE THE UNRESOLVED CONFLICT WITH IRAQ
PROVIDES THE IMMEDIATE JUSTIFICATION, the need for a SUBSTANTIAL
AMERICAN FORCE PRESENCE in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime
of Saddam Hussein.'

The PNAC document supports a 'blueprint for maintaining global US pre-
eminence, PRECLUDING THE RISE OF A GREAT POWER RIVAL, and shaping the
international security order in line with American principles and
interests'.

This 'American grand strategy' must be advanced for 'AS FAR INTO THE
FUTURE AS POSSIBLE', the report says. It also calls for the US to
'fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theatre wars'
as a 'CORE MISSION'.

The report describes American armed forces abroad as 'the cavalry on
the new American frontier'. The PNAC blueprint supports an earlier
document written by Wolfowitz and Libby that said the US must
'DISCOURAGE ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL NATIONS from challenging our
leadership OR EVEN ASPIRING TO A LARGER REGIONAL OR GLOBAL ROLE'.

...

The document

* Reveals worries in the administration that Europe could rival the USA;

* says 'even should Saddam pass from the scene' bases in Saudi Arabia
and Kuwait will remain permanently -- despite domestic opposition in 
the Gulf regimes to the stationing of US troops.

* spotlights [Nuclear power] China for 'regime change'  !

* hints that, despite threatening war against Iraq for developing
weapons of mass destruction, the US may consider developing biological
weapons -- which the nation has banned -- in decades to come. It says: 
'New methods of attack -- electronic, 'non-lethal', biological -- 
will be more widely available ... combat likely will take place in 
new dimensions, in space, cyberspace, and perhaps the world of 
microbes ... advanced forms of biological warfare that can 'target' 
specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm 
of terror to a politically useful tool';

...

Tam Dalyell, the Labour MP, father of the House of Commons and one of
the leading rebel voices against war with Iraq, said: 'This is garbage
from right-wing think-tanks stuffed with chicken-hawks -- men who have 
never seen the horror of war but are in love with the idea of 
war. Men like Cheney, who were draft-dodgers in the Vietnam war.

'This is a blueprint for US world domination -- a new world order of 
their making. These are the thought processes of fantasist 
Americans who want to control the world. I am appalled that a 
British Labour Prime Minister should have got into bed with a crew 
which has this moral standing.' 


= = = =

http://www.sundayherald.com/27735

= = = = 

To take action, please see the links below.

* * * 

Non-corporate news on Iraq:

http://www.zmag.org/CrisesCurEvts/Iraq/IraqCrisis.htm

On 9/11:

* "SEPTEMBER 11th FAMILIES FOR PEACEFUL TOMORROWS", Relatives
of victims of 9/11 speak out against more war and death:
http://www.peacefultomorrows.org/index.html

* To find out about Peace Events for 9/11 or help organize them:

http://www.unitedforpeace.org/

This includes Rita Lasar who lost family in 9/11, 
Masuda Sultan whose civilian family was killed by WAshington's
bombs over Afghanistan, Arun Gandhi, Mahatama Gandhi's grandson,
Osacr Arias, and others.

* Non-corporate news and analysis on Terror, Iraq etc:

http://www.globalexchange.org/september11/

http://www.zmag.org/reactionscalam.htm

Top Ten Reasons Why the US Should Not Invade Iraq:

http://www.globalexchange.org/september11/invadeIraq082702.html

* Action for Justice, not War:

http://www.9-11peace.org/

in particular their "Why Peace?"

http://www.9-11peace.org/peace.php3

"OUR CALL IS THIS: President Bush and citizens around the globe, let us
not enter into World War III. Rather, let us begin immediately to
forge WORLD PEACE I"

It is our strong belief that a non-military response is the best
strategy for a permanent end to terror. We believe in a non-military
response for the following reasons:

[list of reasons] see

http://www.9-11peace.org/peace.php3

* * *